PLTSS.
claptinkleClopclopJangletinkleclopClopCLOPClopclop. low murmur, echo clap YEEEEAAHHhhhh........ Ckkkkkkkshhhhh. tap !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmclopmmmmClopmmmmCLOPmmmmmsqueakCLOPmmmmsqueakCLOPmmmmmmmm
PLTSS.
PL-PLTSS.
clop....clop...clop....clop...clop........ clopclopclopclopclopclopclopclopclopclopClopCLOP!
PLTSS....PLTSS. P-PLTSS.........PLTSSS.....PLTSS.PLTSS. CLPSS...CLPSS.
hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
1 comment:
You and Angela in the previous post have taken similar approaches by recreating, phonetically, the sounds that you heard. Contrasted with Leo's post -- which took a more clinical approach to document the frequency, duration, and amplitude of distinct sonorous events -- this post and Angela's both convey these features through visual cues: size of font, effects to font like bold, italics, or coloring, lower- or upper-case, and so on. This works nicely as a score for an abstract sound poetry performance, though this creates new and distinct sonorous events. In this case, again, oral transposition of what the ear hears does not accurately reproduce but rather remediates and recreates. Very interesting.
Post a Comment